What Brevard Schools' New AI Rules Mean for Students and Teachers
Brevard Public Schools has adopted classroom AI guidelines that set different expectations for students and teachers ahead of the 2026-27 school year.

Brevard Public Schools has adopted new guidelines for artificial intelligence in the classroom just as students and teachers prepare for the 2026-27 school year.
For families trying to decide whether a chatbot is a study tool or a shortcut, the district's basic line is fairly clear: AI may help a student get started, but it cannot do the learning for them.
What students may—and may not—do
Under the guidance described after the School Board's July 21 vote, students may use artificial intelligence for introductory research, brainstorming and organizing ideas. They may not use it to complete an assignment in place of their own work.
That distinction matters because AI can produce polished-looking answers that are inaccurate, incomplete or disconnected from what a class is actually teaching. A student may use a tool to generate possible research questions or arrange an outline, but the final reasoning and work still belong to the student.
The district has not publicly spelled out one universal disclosure format for every grade and subject. Families should therefore check the directions for a specific class or assignment before assuming an AI tool is allowed.
Teachers face an approval process
The rules for educators include an additional safeguard: a teacher needs administrative approval before introducing an AI application in class.
Teachers also may not enter personally identifiable student information into an AI system. Any AI-assisted material still has to align with Florida standards, and the educator remains responsible for checking it for accuracy, bias and age appropriateness before students see it.
That means an AI-generated lesson plan is not treated as a finished lesson. The tool may help with a draft, but a teacher still has to know the standards, review every claim and decide whether the material belongs in the classroom.
A public list of approved tools is planned
The district has said it intends to create a family-facing portal showing which AI applications are in active use. It also plans continued oversight as the technology changes.
That could become one of the most useful parts of the policy. Instead of parents hearing that “the school uses AI” without knowing what that means, a public list could help them see which tools were reviewed and where they are being used.
The portal's final address and launch date were not included in the initial reporting, so families should watch the district's artificial intelligence page and School Board portal for updates.
What families should ask this year
A few practical questions can make the new rules easier to navigate:
- Is AI allowed on this particular assignment?
- Does the teacher want students to disclose how they used it?
- Which parts of the work must be completed without AI assistance?
- Is the tool approved by the school?
- What information should never be entered into it?
The policy does not make every classroom decision automatic. It does establish a shared starting point: students still have to demonstrate their own learning, teachers remain accountable for the material they use, and private student information stays out of AI systems.
That is a more useful message than either banning the technology outright or pretending it cannot create new problems. Brevard schools are allowing AI into the conversation, but not handing it the assignment.



